- - RT @verge: GitHub’s AI-powered Copilot will help you write code for $10 a month https://t.co/hbkCT3QR85 https://t.co/yWRl0Ayfka theverge.com
- - Pentagon Unveils Plan to Make 'Responsible Military AI' More Than Just a Buzzword https://t.co/gcm6xiVkDE gizmodo.com.au
- - “Events From Hell” by @rob_sheridan https://t.co/FlEYNy4vRS twitter.com
- - RT @PatrickCMiller: The Pentagon's plan for 'responsible AI' https://t.co/rAs7wJfhHm bit.ly
- - Even if they’re not actually intelligent, AIs may shift the nature of human expression itself https://t.co/FeVIyZtIhQ theguardian.com
- - https://t.co/rpWh6XsRgL itunes.apple.com
- - 😀 https://t.co/u0oQJKH1sV twitter.com
- - UK rules that AI cannot patent inventions https://t.co/dRxTGvc71x independent.co.uk
- - The Fight Over Which Uses of Artificial Intelligence Europe Should Outlaw | WIRED https://t.co/UMK6SFJALl wired.com
June 2022
As artificial intelligence moves from experimentation into everyday systems, governments and courts struggle to define boundaries. Commercial tools like GitHub Copilot are turning AI into a paid utility for developers, reshaping how code is written and maintained. At the same time, defence agencies are trying to formalise ideas of “responsible AI,” with the Pentagon outlining principles meant to guide military use beyond slogans. Legal and political tensions are sharpening elsewhere: UK courts have ruled that AI cannot be listed as an inventor, and European lawmakers are debating which AI applications should be banned outright. Cultural responses sit alongside policy fights, with artists and writers exploring how AI alters human expression, creativity, and authorship. Together, these pieces show AI becoming harder to ignore — embedded in work, regulated by law, argued over in politics, and questioned in art — even as agreement on its limits remains elusive. That is June 2022 in AI.
We're not responsible for the content of these links.